Daily news for Seattle's Magnolia neighborhood

Magnolia Voice header image 2
 

Heated exchanges at Nickerson Street meeting

March 5th, 2009 · Comments

Over 85 people came to the city’s open house to learn more about the plans to change Nickerson Street. Approximately 19,300 vehicles travel that route each day.

Many drivers in attendance tonight were frustrated with the plan to remove one lane of traffic each way.  The changes will be on the corridor between the Ballard Bridge and W. Etruria Street.  A number of people challenged city engineers claims that reducing the number of lanes won’t increase traffic on Nickerson.  The city calls it ‘rechannelization’ and claims that it has worked on other streets.  They also say that the left turn lanes will increase efficiency.

The plan includes adding a bike lane westbound and a wider travel lane for bikes eastbound with shared lane markings (sharrows).  A number of bikers attended the meeting in support of the changes.

 

Drivers expressed frustration because they think there will be increased traffic back ups.  The city believes the changes, including a center turn lane and more crosswalks, will make the street safer.

Opponent Elizabeth Campbell says “Turning Nickerson into a bicycle friendly corridor inconveniences the majority of people who use a car to carry out their activities on this important transportation corridor.” 

She is also concerned that Nickerson is one of the alternatives the city expects Magnolia residents to use when the bored tunnel replaces the viaduct.  Her group opposes the tunnel.

Tags: Uncategorized

  • Josh&M
    I drive on that street everyday to work from Magnolia to Sandpoint, it does get backed up often at the Fremont Bridge intersection but I would gladly ride my bike if a bike lane was implemented and I felt safer riding from Dravus to Nickerson.

    Drivers go so fast on that road in the morning which is a big part of why I have been hesitant to ride everyday.

    In the winter however with less people riding I think backups will clog that street from the Bridge to before SPU and even back as far as 15th.

    This plan while it has some good points doesn't sound like it is really that well thought out.
  • Valentijn
    How long until Campbell files another lawsuit she can't win? Get anti-change candidates voted in, or let the government do its job with the support it has from the majority.
  • Priscilla
    The Fremont Bridge opens an average of every fifteen minutes year round and more in the summer. Has no one in the traffic division ever seen the back ups? Hello, you are further disabling a neighborhood that is already coping with the changes to the viaduct and a new cruise ship terminal in their neighborhood. NO THANKS.

    Please take a moment and write to SDOT and express your dismay at this plan. If they want a bike lane perhaps they should foresake the parking instead of decreasing the automobile lanes.
  • Ryan
    Sounds like more of the Elizabeth Campbell "stop any sort of change" hysteria at this meeting.
  • Steve
    I attended the meeting. There were some 'heated' exchanges, as well as plenty of even-toned discussions and disagreements.
    I think there was also some frustration over the format of the meeting - 1-on-1 Q&A... I kept hearing the same questions being asked and answered, over and over again.

    My biggest concern is that SDOT has no plans for a follow-up meeting or review... last night was 'it'. I asked that they reconsider that plan.
  • Ballardite451
    Elizabeth Campbell is the same person who proposes a magical rainbow sky bridge to replace the viaduct - and I'm supposed to trust her over a traffic engineer? Two lanes plus a center lane for turning movements works great up to 25,000 trips per day or so. And while it;'s great that a bike lane is being striped, this is primarily about pedestrian safety. Have you ever had a driver stop so you could cross the street, only to have a blind driver in the adjacent lane blow past you?
  • DB
    SDOT is clueless,....but is that any new NEWS!! This is truly a main way for us all Magnolians to get to I-5
    to go to Mercer sucks and what happens when it is getting worked on. Sorry Seattle that our traffic engineers are just trying to have something to do at this point. I say hire a new SDOT Chief bye bye Grace!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  • magpie
    I was at the meeting near the end and I have to agree that there were heated exchanges. There was a woman from Queen Anne who was loudly explaining her concerns to a guy from the city.
    Everyone was civil but the city reps were definitely getting grilled in a number of conversations.
    I would say the crowd seemed mixed in terms of support. Not sure what happens next?
  • Judy
    Some drivers are for the changes as well - personally I think that people drive way too fast on that road and I welcome anything that makes it safer, even if it takes me a little longer to drive that route.
  • Nunya
    Time to move forward.
  • Bobby
    I was at the meeting and I did not hear any heated exchanges.
    Unlike with anonymous web postings, most people conduct themselves quite well face to face, even when they disagree.
    It was fairly easy to tell who was in favor and who was against the plan, nonetheless attendees were civil.
blog comments powered by Disqus


More News from North Seattle