Daily news for Seattle's Magnolia neighborhood

Magnolia Voice header image 2
 

Photos of possible suspects in Magnolia armed robbery

September 14th, 2009 · Comments

The Seattle Police Department has released pictures of the suspects believed to be responsible for an armed robbery in Magnolia last week.  The same suspects are also wanted in eight other robberies in the city since September 1 in the north end and Capitol Hill.

These pictures come from video surveillance photographs.  The pictured suspects are believed to have committed a robbery on Lake City Way NE when a male victim was approached by three black males who struck him in the head and kicked him before taking his wallet. The female suspect pictured was captured on surveillance video accompanying the suspects at a convenience store but there are no reports of a woman involved in any of the robberies. The store was not robbed but these photos were acquired during the course of the investigation.

Robbery detectives believe these suspects may be responsible for the Magnolia robbery in which four teenagers were robbed at gunpoint early Wednesday morning.  The mother of one of the boys says the victims were left shaken following the robbery.  They were playing video games at the home of a friend who lives near the 2600 block of Magnolia Boulevard and they were outside around 1a.m. when the robbery occured.   She says the boys figured they were safe in their own neighborhood, near one of their own homes. 

The robbers had two revolvers and one semi-automatic handgun.  They threatened the victims with the guns, sticking them in the boys necks, faces and chests. The robbers worked as a team, patting down each victim. They took everything from the victims including wallets, cash, graduation gift cards, driver’s license, passport and a new college ID card.  They also stole the boys cell phones, jackets, keys, a backpack and an ipod.  

Guns were used in most of the robberies and suspects should be considered armed and dangerous. Anyone with information about any of these robberies or who may know the identities or whereabouts of any of the suspects is asked to call 911 or the Seattle Police Robbery Unit at (206) 684-5535.

Tags: Uncategorized

  • motorrad
    Didn't improve the behavior of the morons yelling down speakers at the recent town hall meetings. They were video taped and didn't care. They will be on youtube embarrassing their kids and grandkids but I don't think they care. In the case of illegal activities, many feel the odds are well in their favor when dealing with seattle cops.
  • C. Hill
    It's "Capitol Hill" not "Capital Hill."
  • Shaniqua
    They look like typical Magnolia residents. Easy for them to blend in down in the Village.
  • Mf
    Hey, racism is alive and well in Magnolia. How surprising.
  • JM
    Bring back the cougar!
  • Freddie
    Anybody here enjoy watching "The First 48". Main thing you learn from it is jusat how dumb these people are and how they ALWAYS manage to walk into a convenience store near the scene of the crime.
  • Magmom
    From the pictures it looks like those boys are buying Arizona brand Iced Tea. It's hard to tell but one of them looks like Mucho Mango (?)
    Cameras in "all public places" would be a logistical nightmare Mac. The cost of installation, maintenance, and monitoring would be astronomical. Even a small park such as the one where this incident took place would require at least 4-5 cameras. On the other hand, why the heck not? while we are at it lets strap cameras to all of the raccoons in Magnolia and put up 13ft tall fences around our parks
  • Mac
    Video cameras are cheap and reliable. When you were a kid did you ever envision having optically automated faucets in public restrooms? Now they are everywhere because they are cheaper to manufacture, and more efficient than manual faucets. Similarly video cameras are inexpensive, reliable, and well worth the small investment to curtail crime.
    As an example: Every few weeks I call the city graffiti hotline (684-7587) to report the graffiti on Karen's place playground. The city then sends out a worker to clean it off. A few weeks later, the graffiti is back...and the cycle repeats. Do you really think that paying a government employee's salary is more efficient than the cost of a few video cameras? Why not simply install some video cameras in order to catch the vandals and throw them in jail?
  • SPG
    First, you would need to have people employed to monitor these cameras for criminal activity, which we do not have the money for.
    Second, you would need to have a police force large enough to respond to these crimes in progress, which we do not.
    Third, you would need to have a criminal justice system willing to actually punish those caught committing these crimes, which we also do not have.
    Fourth, you would need the money and extra space to house these criminals in a jail which we do not have.
  • Mac
    Naysayers will always be with us. It is up to those with vision to see beyond their self-imposed limitations and make a better world for all. I hate to get muddled down in mundane details, but I think a few comments demonstrating the shortsightedness of these objections is worth while:
    In most cases cameras would not need to be monitored. It is only when someone reports a crime that the tape would be reviewed. The reporter would only need to call in the time and location. The internal memory would then be downloaded. In those rare cases when regular reviewing would be worthwhile (e.g. vandalism) this job could be outsourced to another country with cheap labor. Video cameras would make the police force more efficient. They could do more work with fewer people. Fewer criminals would be on the street. Logical people who may be inclined toward criminal activity would see the odds against them and be encouraged to make a living playing by the rules. Those who cannot be reasoned with will be more quickly locked up or otherwise institutionalized making the world a safer and more prosperous place.
  • Mf
    Thanks for a bit of logic there SPG, although I don't think it will go very far with folks like Mac. Seriously, someone that would write "As far as I am concerned, video cameras should be in all public places" doesn't seem like the type that would actually think through the ramifications of such a flip statement. Add a fifth point, cameras just don't work as a deterrent with the people they are supposed to be deterring, but they do affect my privacy. Cameras are a lazy option that let us ignore real problems like proper funding for our police force.
  • Mac
    Here is a good example of the value of video surveillance. As far as I am concerned, video cameras should be in all public places. When people know they are on camera, they behave as if they will be held accountable for their actions. Isn't this how society wants all people to behave?
blog comments powered by Disqus